What is a primary goal of the Substitute Decisions Act, 1992 regarding health care?

The primary goal of the Substitute Decisions Act, 1992 is to provide a framework for making decisions on behalf of individuals who are incapable of making those decisions themselves, particularly in regard to health care. This includes the appointment of an attorney for health care decisions, which directly aligns with option C. The Act facilitates the appointment of a substitute decision-maker who can make health care choices in the best interest of the individual when they are unable to do so due to incapacity.

While the other options touch on important elements of the legal and ethical landscape surrounding health care decisions for incapable individuals, they do not capture the core goal quite as precisely as the appointment of attorneys. For instance, ensuring legal representation (as mentioned in option A) is significant but is not the primary focus of the Act; rather, it’s about facilitating decision-making. Providing clarity on healthcare rights (as in option B) is a part of the conversation, but again, the most direct goal is to enable appointment of decision-makers. Preventing family disputes (as highlighted in option D) is beneficial, but it’s more of a consequence of implementing the framework effectively rather than the primary aim of the Act itself.

This focus on empowering designated attorneys to make health care decisions underscores the critical